Can you identify the split infinitive in that example?

你能辨认出那个例子中的分裂不定式吗？

And, by the way, it is typically adverbs that people oppose when you're splitting infinitives.

顺便说一句，当你拆分不定式时，人们通常会用副词替代。

A split infinitive happens when an adverb or other modifier is placed between " to" and the verb.

当副词或其他修饰语置于" to" 和动词之间时，就会出现分裂不定式。

So often it's a case of it just sounding better when we split an infinitive, it sounds more natural.

所以这是把不定式拆开听起来更好的例子，它听起来更自然。

If you have trouble remembering what a split infinitive is, you can think of a famous one in popular culture.

如果你记不住分裂不定式是什么，你可以想到流行文化中的一个著名的不定式。

Now, some sentences actually require a split infinitive, which makes it all the more bananas that teachers tell you to never split an infinitive.

有些句子事实上要求把不定式分开，这跟老师告诉你的不要把不定式分开又不一样了。

There are some people who think that split infinitives are wrong, are ungrammatical.

有些人认为拆分不定式是错误的，不合语法的。

Take Captain Kirk's supposed mistake: the split infinitive.

以柯克船长假设的错误为例：分裂不定式。

Many teachers will tell you this because they are simplifying things a little bit, but in reality we do split infinitives.

很多老师告诉你这条规则是因为他们要简化一下规则，但事实上我们确实会把不定式拆开。

But you can't split Latin infinitives because they're always just one word, like amare.

但是你不能拆分拉丁语不定式，因为它们总是只有一个词，比如 amare。