To paraphrase the great social scientist Joseph Schumpeter: there is no radical innovation without creative destruction.

套用卓越的社会科学家约瑟夫·熊彼特的话：没有创造性的毁坏就没有彻底的革新。

Schumpeter arrived there after taking a train from the airport.

熊彼特从机场乘坐火车抵达那里。

Messrs Erixon and Weigel write that the very engine of capitalist growth, the creative destruction described by Joseph Schumpeter, is kaput.

他们在书中写道，资本主义发展的“核心引擎”（約瑟夫·熊彼特曾称其为创造性破坏）已运作失常。

But many economists in the 20th Century thought the developing world was not ready for Schumpeter’s ideas.

但 20 世纪的许多经济学家认为， 发展中国家还没有准备好接受熊彼特的想法。

Banks liberate investment, an engine of Schumpeter's creative destruction, from the voluntary abstinence routine of the savers.

银行将投资——熊彼特创造性破坏的引擎——从储户的自愿节制常规中解放出来。

Much as Bartleby would love to hear about Bagehot's egg whisk or Schumpeter's salad spinner, he hopes this idea does not catch on at The Economist.

尽管巴托比很想听听关于白芝浩的鸡蛋打蛋器或熊彼特的沙拉旋转器的事，但他希望这个想法不会在《经济学人》流行起来。

It may not all be gospel truth (the description of British journalists he delivers while staring at Schumpeter—" bad teeth, hard questions" —is only half true).

这可能并不全是福音真理（他在盯着熊彼特时对英国记者的描述——“坏牙，棘手的问题” ——只对了一半）。

In that vein, Schumpeter asked Aleksandr, a Ukrainian Uber driver in San Francisco, what he made of a driverless future, and surprisingly his eyes lit up.

本着这种精神，熊彼特向旧金山的乌克兰优步司机亚历山大询问他对无人驾驶未来的看法，令人惊讶的是，他的眼睛亮了起来。

When Schumpeter visited an Amazon Fresh store in Los Angeles recently, the fresh meat and fish counters were so barren they looked like part of a going-out-of-business sale.

当熊彼特最近参观洛杉矶的一家亚马逊生鲜店时，新鲜​​的肉类和鱼类柜台空无一人， 看起来就像是停业促销的一部分。