So we have to conclude that the reading process has been shared and collaborative.

因此，我们必须得出结论，阅读过程是共享和协作的。

When the reading brain skims like this, it reduces time allocated to deep reading processes.

当阅读大脑像这样略读时，它会减少分配给深度阅读过程的时间。

As UCLA psychologist Patricia Greenfield writes, the result is that less attention and time will be allocated to slower, time-demanding deep reading processes.

正如加州大学洛杉矶分校心理学家帕特里夏格林菲尔德所写，结果是更少的注意力和时间将分配给更慢、更耗时的深度阅读过程。

Research surfacing in many parts of the world now cautions that each of these essential 'deep reading' processes may be under threat as we move into digital-based modes of reading.

世界许多地方的研究现在警告说，随着我们进入基于数字的阅读模式，这些基本的“深度阅读”过程中的每一个都可能受到威胁。

The possibility that critical analysis, empathy and other deep reading processes could become the unintended' collateral damage' of our digital culture is not a straightforward binary issue about print versus digital reading.

批判性分析、同理心和其他深度阅读过程可能成为我们数字文化的意外“附带损害”的可能性并不是关于印刷阅读与数字阅读的简单二元问题。