Hamilton noted the irony of the Republican president adopting a liberal interpretation of the Constitution by claiming that congressional approval was sufficient to make the land purchase.

汉密尔顿指出，共和党总统对宪法采取自由主义解释，声称国会批准足以购买土地，这具有讽刺意味。

In the House, Madison argued that the proposal was unconstitutional because the Constitution did not have a provision for setting up a central bank, reversing his liberal interpretation in The Federalist Papers.

在众议院，麦迪逊辩称该提案违宪， 因为宪法没有设立中央银行的条款，扭转了他在《联邦党人文集》中的自由主义解释。