The Mark fragment was, supposedly, part of the Green collection. It could not also belong to the EES.

这个所谓的马可碎片据说是格林收藏的一部分。它不可能也属于埃及考古学协会的收藏。

They are part of the Oxyrhynchus collection of ancient papyrus, owned by the Egypt Exploration Society (EES) and housed at Oxford's Sackler Library.

这些物品是古代纸草文献的奥西林库斯（Oxyrhynchus）收藏品的一部分，由埃及探险学会（Egypt Exploration Society，简称 EES）拥有，并存放在牛津大学萨克勒图书馆。

Michael Holmes, the director of the Green Scholars Initiative since 2015, believed that the fragment of Mark belonged to them, not the EES.

迈克尔·霍尔姆斯，自 2015 年起担任格林学者计划的主任，认为这段马可福音的片段属于他们，而不是埃及考古学会的。

In short, if Obbink were indeed trying to sell it, this move would stop him. Or so the EES official thought.

简而言之，如果奥比克确实试图出售这份碎片，这一举措将制止他。至少这是埃及考古学学会的官员所认为的。

The fragment had not been officially signed out, but EES officials believed Obbink had it in his possession ostensibly to study.

这份碎片并未正式出借，但埃及考古学学会的官员相信奥比克实际上是为了研究而持有它。

JulianNorthbrook.com And I write the monthly EES Gazette, the 12-page newsletter that gets printed up and sent out to EES members every month.

JulianNorthbrook.com 我写了每月的 EES 公报，这是一份 12 页的时事通讯，每个月都会打印出来并发送给 EES 成员。

Of course, the items couldn't have been sold to Hobby Lobby — not least because the EES actually had possession of the items themselves.

当然，这些物品不可能被卖给霍比洛比——至少因为埃及考古学会实际上拥有这些物品。

In April 2019, Holmes emailed Roberta Mazza in her capacity as an EES trustee, telling her that Obbink had allegedly sold the fragments to Hobby Lobby.

在 2019 年 4 月，霍尔姆斯以埃及考古学会董事的身份给罗伯塔·玛扎发送了电子邮件，告诉她奥比克或已将这些碎片卖给了霍比洛比。

" Ah, you weesh to consult Amthor professionally? He weel be ver-ry pleased. But he ees ver-ry beesy. When you weesh to see him" ?

“啊，你想咨询 Amthor 的专业意见吗？他会非常高兴。但他会非常生气。你什么时候想见他” ？

In the following weeks, it was concluded that a further 13 papyri belonging to EES had been wrongfully sold to Hobby Lobby, 11 apparently by Obbink, two by the Jerusalem antiquities dealers, Baidun

在接下来的几周里，他们得出结论，另外 13 件属于埃及考古学会的莎草纸被错误地卖给了霍比洛比，其中 11 件显然是由奥比克出售的，另外两件是由耶路撒冷古董商巴伊登出售的。